State v. Lockstedt’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An alert, conversely, is `the dog's innate or involuntary response when sniffing a particular odor.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a dog's trained behavior to signal its handler that a target odor is in the location being sniffed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Although probable cause is generally required for a search, the requisite level of suspicion necessary to effectuate the stop of a vehicle is not equivalent to probable cause necessary for an arrest or a search warrant. Law enforcement officers are only required to show a reasonable suspicion to stop an automobile. That is, an officer must have specific and articulable suspicion of a violation. Therefore, the basis needed for a traffic stop is minimal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Starkey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.