Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 SD 47 - State v. Lockstedt

State v. Lockstedt’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An alert, conversely, is `the dog's innate or involuntary response when sniffing a particular odor.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a dog's trained behavior to signal its handler that a target odor is in the location being sniffed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Although probable cause is generally required for a search, the requisite level of suspicion necessary to effectuate the stop of a vehicle is not equivalent to probable cause necessary for an arrest or a search warrant. Law enforcement officers are only required to show a reasonable suspicion to stop an automobile. That is, an officer must have specific and articulable suspicion of a violation. Therefore, the basis needed for a traffic stop is minimal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.