Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 SD 98 - Heib v. Lehrkamp

Heib v. Lehrkamp’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

1 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently August 2024

1 district · 17 state decisions

100200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Baker v. McCollan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we decide only whether there were genuine issues of material fact and whether the law was correctly applied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) The commencement or continuance of an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding; (2) its legal causation by the present defendant against plaintiff, who was defendant in the original proceeding; (3) its bona fide termination in favor of the present plaintiff; (4) the absence of probable cause for such proceeding; (5) the presence of malice therein; (6) damage conforming to legal standards resulting to plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[s]ummary judgment is a drastic remedy and should not be granted unless the moving party has established a right to a judgment with such clarity as to leave no room for controversy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.