State v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Allen v. Friel (2008), State v. Lenkart (2011)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Garcia Abrego · United States v. Green · United States v. Alexander · State v. Shickles · State v. Decorso
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a mistrial is not required where an improper statement is not intentionally elicited, is made in passing, and is relatively innocuous in light of all the testimony presented.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Duran · State v. Cooper“cannot be said to have had a fair trial,”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cooper · State v. Murphy“'On appeal from a jury verdict, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to that verdict and recite the facts accordingly.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.