Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 17 - State v. Peterson

State v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Michigan v. Long · Minnesota v. Dickerson · State v. Brake · Berry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “police may conduct a protective frisk only when they have reasonable suspicion that the detained individual is armed and dangerous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[The only permissible objective of the ... frisk is the discovery of weapons that may be used against the officer or others.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “objectively according to the totality of the cireumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.