Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 22 - Parduhn v. Bennett

Parduhn v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2022

20 state decisions

110200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Armed Forces Insurance Exchange v. Harrison · Thurston v. Box Elder County · RHN CORP. v. Veibell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court must allow a party to intervene if that party can establish that (1) its motion to intervene is timely, (2) the party has an interest in the subject matter of the litigation, (8) the party's interest is or may be inadequately represented [if their intervention is not permitted], and (4) the party is or may be bound by a judgment in the action.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the district court's [unique] ability to balance facts and craft equitable remedies and our [corresponding] hesitance to act as a Monday morning quarterback in such matters.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Generally, ... intervention is not to be permitted after entry of judgment. [ 2 ] The courts are reluctant to make exceptions to the general rule and do so only upon a strong showing of entitlement and justification, or such unusual or compelling cireum-stances as will justify the failure to seek intervention earlier.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.