Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 24 - Hale v. Beckstead

Hale v. Beckstead’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc. (2009), Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith (2010)

1 district · 33 state decisions

180200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dixon v. Stewart · House v. Armour of America, Inc. · Stephens v. Henderson · English v. Kienke · Donahue v. Durfee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(a) knows or by the exercise of reasonable care would discover the condition, and should realize that it involves an unreasonable risk of harm to such invitees, and (b) should expect that they will not discover or realize the danger, or will fail to protect themselves against it, and (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[when reviewing a grant of summary judgment, we are to review the facts and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'A possessor of land is not liable to his invitees for physical harm caused to them by any activity or condition on the land whose danger is known or obvious to them, unless the possessor should anticipate the harm despite such knowledge or obviousness!”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.