Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 26 - State v. Markland

State v. Markland’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
4
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably State v. Worwood (2007), Swift v. State (2006)

42 state decisions

220200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Arvizu · Illinois v. Wardlow · United States v. Hensley · Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada Humboldt County et al.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[It is settled law that 'a police officer may detain and question an individual when the officer has reasonable, articulable suspicion that the person has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity'”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “accord deference to an officer's ability to distinguish between innocent and suspicious actions.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) An officer may approach a citizen at any time and pose questions so long as the citizen is not detained against his will; (2) an officer may seize a person if the officer has an articulable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime ...; (8) an officer may arrest a suspect if the officer has probable cause to believe an offense had been committed or is being committed.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.