Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 28 - State v. Corwell

State v. Corwell’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sery · State v. Dean · State v. Gibbons · State v. Harmon · State v. Visser

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The substantive goal of rule 11 is to ensure that defendants know of their rights and thereby understand the basic consequences of their decision to plead guilty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]lthough the phrase might suggest otherwise, strict compliance with rule [25] does not require that a [juvenile] court follow a `particular script' or any other `specific method of communicating the rights enumerated by rule [25].'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “means that the trial court [must] personally establish that the defendant's guilty plea is truly knowing and voluntary and establish on the record that the defendant knowingly waived his ... constitutional rights.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.