State v. Shipp’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · State v. Saunders · State v. Reed · State v. Taylor · State v. Pike
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both elements are necessary to successfully challenge the participation of the juror in question.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Redding · State v. Maestas“Although contact before voir dire may implicate the concerns ... relating to the appearance of impropriety and the possibility of influence over the juror, the voir dire process ... already exists as a means to unearth and assess any possible bias and prejudice in potential jurors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Voir dire is intended to provide a tool for counsel and the court to carefully and skillfully determine, by inquiry, whether biases and prejudices, latent as well as acknowledged, will interfere with a fair trial if a particular juror serves in it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.