State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2026
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Knight · State v. Green · State v. Fontana · State v. Nelson-Waggoner · State v. Wilcox
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'As long as a defendant is sufficiently apprised of the State's evidence upon which the charge is based so defendant can prepare to meet that case, the constitutional requirement is fulfilled.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“does not ... expressly mandate identification of the exact date when an alleged offense occurred.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'The right to - adequate notice in the Utah Constitution requires the prosecution to state the charge with sufficient specificity to protect the defendant from multiple prosecutions for the same crime and to give notice sufficient for the one charged to prepare a defense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.