State v. Mullins’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on State v. Merrill · 23 F. Supp. 2d 246 - Geraci v. Senkowski · Utah Farm Production Credit Ass'n v. Watts · Barnard v. Utah State Bar · 2002 UT App 305 - State v. Norris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a final disposition of a case is entered by a district court, any unresolved motions inconsistent with that disposition are deemed resolved by implication.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We review legal conclusions concerning the existence of jurisdiction for correctness and afford no deference to the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“removed any lingering doubt as to the jurisdictional consequences of a failure to seek a timely withdrawal of a plea”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.