Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 45 - State v. Cruz

State v. Cruz’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Pratt v. Nelson (2007), State v. Bond (2015)

38 state decisions

230200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Olano · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Arizona v. Fulminante · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule, claims not raised before the trial court may not be raised on appeal.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Erroneous reasonable doubt instructions ... give rise to structural errors, which are different than garden-variety trial errors. Structural errors are flaws in the framework within which the trial proceeds, rather than simply an error in the trial process it self.... [A] structural error analysis presumes prejudice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[S]o long as the court instructs the jury on the necessity that the defendant’s guilt be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, the Constitution does not require that any particular form of words be used in advising the jury of the government’s burden of proof. Rather, “taken as a whole, the instructions [must] correctly convey the concept of reasonable doubt to the jury.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.