Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 47 - State v. Hankerson

State v. Hankerson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Banner · State v. Harmon · State v. Visser · 22 Utah 2d 361 - State v. Wilson · State v. Petersen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a prisoner is serving a term of imprisonment in the state prison ... and there [are] pending [charges] ... and the prisoner shall deliver ... a written demand specifying the nature of the charge and the court wherein it is pending ... he shall be entitled to have the charge brought to trial within 120 days of the date of delivery of written notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.