State v. Tarrats’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably State v. Wright (2013), State v. Beverly (2018)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Rock v. Arkansas · Michigan v. Lucas · Hughes v. Raines · State v. Dibello
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[elven where such evidence bears some marginal relevance, it has an unusual propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead the jury and is likely to distort the jury's deliberative process and should therefore be excluded.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) truthful prior allegation of [sexual abuse] carries no value whatsoever in the trial process, and its admission into evidence bears a high potential for humiliating the accuser, discouraging victims from reporting sexual crimes against them, and introducing irrelevant and collateral issues that may confuse or distract the jury.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.