Tillman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 2019 UT App 173 - State v. Popp (2019), Gardner v. State (2010)
1 district · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the evidence at issue is 'favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; (2) the evidence was {suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently'; and (3) prejudice ensued.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“On appeal from a ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief, we review the post-conviction court's legal conclusions for correctness and its factual findings for clear error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Evidence is material if `there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.