Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 61 - Manning v. State

Manning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Reid (2006), State v. Rhinehart (2007)

57 state decisions

340200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United State v. Morgan · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · James v. United States · State v. Ortiz · People v. Callaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unconstitutionally deprived, through no fault of his own, of his right to appeal.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “(1) the defendant asked his or her attorney to file an appeal but the attorney, after agreeing to file, failed to do so; (2) the defendant diligently but futilely attempted to appeal within the statutory time frame without fault on defendant's part; or (8) the court or the defendant's attorney failed to properly advise defendant of the right to appeal.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A defendant is entitled to reinstatement of his direct appeal right if he 'has been prevented in some meaningful way from proceeding with a first appeal of right.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.