Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2020
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Wood · State v. Tennyson · Hoyle v. Monson · State v. Maestas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TJactical decisions such as 'what witnesses to call, what objections to make, and, by and large, what defenses to interpose, are generally left to the professional judgment of counsel'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a petitioner must persuade the court that, given the combined weight of the meritoriousness of the petitioner's claim and the justifications for raising it late,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(tlhe petitioner bears the burden of pointing to sufficient factual evidence or legal authority to support a conclusion of meritoriousness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Winward v. State · Bluemel v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.