State v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Lafferty · State v. Geukgeuzian · State v. Widdison · State v. James · 2004 UT App 3 - State v. Stubbs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a fair and impartial trial cannot be had,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“: If the prosecution or a defendant in a criminal action believes that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in the jurisdiction where the action is pending, either may, by motion, supported by an affidavit setting forth facts, ask to have the trial of the case transferred to another jurisdiction. Utah R.Crim. P. 29(d)(1). These provisions make clear that the purpose of a change of venue is to achieve a fair and impartial trial. In this context, lack of fairness and impartiality at trial is a function of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Utah R.Crim. P. 29(d)(1). Defendant asserts that he could not receive a fair and impartial trial in Sevier County-the location where Defendant committed the criminal acts charged in this case. %13 Criminal defendants may properly challenge a trial court's denial of a change of venue motion following conviction by a jury. When such is the case, we consider”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.