State v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Ashcraft (2015), 2011 UT App 168 - State v. Burke (2011)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Idaho v. Wright · State v. Holgate · State v. Hamilton · State v. Verde · State v. Petree
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard of review on the admissibility of hearsay evidence is complex, since the determination of admissibility 'often contains a number of rulings, each of which may require a different standard of review'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“We will reverse a jury verdict for insufficient evidence only if we determine that reasonable minds could not have reached the verdict.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin · State v. Lingmann“[OJwnership and/or occupancy of the residence or vehicle where the drugs were found, presence of defendant at the time drugs were found, defendant's proximity to the drugs, previous drug use, incriminating statements or behavior, presence of drugs in a specific area where the defendant had control, ete.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.