Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 69 - State v. Rees

State v. Rees’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Geukgeuzian · Manning v. State · State v. Johnson · State v. Rawlings · Cardall v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is an ancient common law writ that exists to correct fundamental errors which render a criminal proceeding irregular and invalid,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is not entitled to secure extraordinary relief but must instead pursue his PCRA remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “defectively prosecuted because his appellate counsel was ineffective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.