State v. Lara’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2025
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Manning v. State · Loffredo v. Holt · State v. S.H. · State v. Tuttle · State v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For example, when [this court] turn[s] away an untimely filed appeal on the grounds that we do not have jurisdiction to entertain it, we are granting 'jurisdictional' effect to our own rules of procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hon. Boyden“provid[ing] a clear indication that the trial court has regained jurisdiction to take action consistent with the mandate [of the appellate court],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an appellate court is without power to recall a mandate for the purpose of reexamining the cause on the merits, or to correct judicial error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.