Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 75 - State v. Clark

State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Von Hake v. Thomas · State v. Lafferty · Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp. · Shipman v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the proper method for contesting an adverse ruling is to appeal it, not to violate it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “must marshal all of the evidence in support of the trial court's findings of fact and then demonstrate that the evidence, including all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, is insufficient to support the findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “marshal all the evidence in support of the finding and then demonstrate that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the finding even when viewing it in a light most favorable to the court below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.