Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT 87 - Smith v. Price Development Co.

Smith v. Price Development Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City · McCullough v. Commonwealth of Virginia · Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington · Colman v. Utah State Land Board · Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a completed, consummated right for present or future enjoyment”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Bagford v. Ephraim City, 904 P.2d 1095, 1099 (Utah 1995). Such a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.