State v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district · 68 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (2007), State v. Laycock (2009)
2 district · 68 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koon v. United States · Miller v. Weaver · State v. Lopes · Renn v. Utah State Board of Pardons · C.T. Ex Rel. Taylor v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unlike a party filing a direct appeal, a petitioner seeking ... extraordinary relief has no right to receive a remedy that corrects a lower court's mishandling of a particular case. Rather, whether relief is ultimately granted is left to the sound discretion of the court hearing the petition.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“we read the plain language of the statute as a whole, and interpret its provisions in harmony with other statutes in the same chapter and related chapters.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy ... available”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.