State v. Larsen’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2024
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · State v. Dunn · State v. Holgate · State v. Lafferty · State v. Dean
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(I) an error exists; (M) the error should have been obvious to the trial court; and (%i) the error is harmful, ie., absent the error, there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“there is a reasonable likelihood of a more favorable outcome for the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If any one of these requirements is not met, plain error is not established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.