Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UT App 204 - Cache County v. Beus

2005 UT App 204 - Cache County v. Beus’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 2024

8 state decisions

50200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Pena · 438 Main Street v. Easy Heat, Inc. · Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · Jau-Fei Chen v. Stewart · Thurston v. Box Elder County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`A trial court cannot consider the issue of entitlement to appellate attorney fees on its own initiative because this decision is the sole prerogative of the appellate court. The only time a trial court has any discretion in the matter of appellate attorney fees is when an appellate court determines that appellate attorney fees are warranted, but remands the issue to the trial court for a determination of the amount to be awarded.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If attorney fees are recoverable by contract, a party is entitled only to those fees attributable to the successful vindication of contractual rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[R]eviewing whether a district court complied with the mandate [of an appellate court] presents a question of law, which we review for correctness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.