State v. Kooyman’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently January 2020
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rhode Island v. Innis · Michigan v. Summers · Burger v. Kemp · Arizona v. Mauro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presumes the admission of all relevant evidence except where the evidence has an unusual propensity to unfairly prejudice, inflame, or mislead the Jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of ... unfair prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“-'reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.