2005 UT App 310 - Paar v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2026
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax Commission · Board of Education of the Granite School District v. Salt Lake County · Olsen v. Samuel McIntyre Investment Co. · Calhoun v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. · Depew v. Depew
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“interpret[ ] statutes to give meaning to all parts, and avoid[ ] rendering portions of the statute superfluous.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The record interest holder shall serve a copy of the petition [to nullify the lien] on the lien claimant and a notice of the hearing pursuant to Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 4, Process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because we assume that the legislature used each term in the statute advisedly, we read the statute's words literally unless such a reading is unreasonably confused or inoperable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. L.M. v. J.B.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.