Argyle v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Valcarce v. Fitzgerald · Ault v. Holden · RHN CORP. v. Veibell · Van Dyke v. Chappell · Hales v. Frakes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court.” 2 . The Browns also argue that the trial court erred by finding that the Browns did not occupy the Subject Property "up to a visible line marked by monuments, fences, or buildings”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Jorgensen“The mere fact that a fence happens to be put up and neither party does anything about it for a long period of time will not establish it as the true boundary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to establish acquiescence, [the plaintiff] was required to show more than inaction on the part of the [defendants]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.