2005 UT App 41 - State v. Chism’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2021
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · State v. Pena · State v. Chatton · Miller v. AT & T Network Systems · United States v. McSwain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[iInvestigative acts that are not reasonably related to dispelling or resolving the articulated grounds for [a traffic} stop”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Baker · State v. Mikkelson“(1) An officer may approach a citizen at any time and pose questions so long as the citizen is not detained against his will; (2) an officer may seize a person if the officer has an articu-lable suspicion that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime ...; (3) an officer may arrest a suspect if the officer has probable cause to believe an offense had been committed or is being committed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the person has committed or is about to commit a crime; however the detention must be temporary and last no longer than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.