2005 UT App 434 - State v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Larsen · State v. Dibello · State v. Sheets · Holmes Development, LLC v. Cook · State v. Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The correct interpretation of a statute is a question of law and is reviewed for correctness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Defendant here did not have to accept the terms of his probation.... [He] did not choose incarceration. He chose probation and thereby accepted its terms. Having accepted its terms, he now must abide by them.” Id. ¶ 19 (citing State v. Allmendinger, 565 P.2d 1119, 1121 (Utah 1977)). 7 .Candedo further asserts that we should review his due process claim despite his failure to preserve it because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the evidence and its inferences are so inconclusive or inherently improbable that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt.... Thus, so long as some evidence and reasonable inferences support the jury's findings, we will not disturb them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.