Haupt v. Heaps’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · State v. Pena · State v. Rimmasch · State v. Larsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To prevail on an appeal based on instructions to the jury, this court must find both that the instruction was inaccurate and that there is not a mere possibility, but a reasonable likelihood that the error affected the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[Elvidence not shown to be reliable cannot, as a matter of law, assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue and, therefore, is inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thompson“applies only to novel scientific methods and techniques”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.