Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 UTAPP 482 - State v. Ranquist

State v. Ranquist’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Thurman · State v. Brake · State v. Decorso · State v. Markland · State v. Hansen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[wle review the trial court's legal conclusions for correctness, giving no deference to the court's application of the law to the facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In search and seizure cases, we review the district court's factual findings 'under a clearly erroneous standard.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.