Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 VT 20 - State v. Pontbriand

State v. Pontbriand’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
6
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Rogers (2009), State v. Brillon (2008)

42 state decisions

260200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Arizona v. Fulminante · Oregon v. Mathiason · Lego v. Twomey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “played a significant role in inducing [it].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Looking at the totality of the circumstances, the facts found by the trial court illustrate that [the defendant] was not in police custody during the interview, and we so hold. Accordingly, Miranda is inapplicable here, and the police were not obliged to stop questioning [the defendant] when he indicated he wished to speak with a lawyer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Therefore, the trial court's findings of fact regarding the course of the interview receive deference, but its ultimate legal determination that the totality of the circumstances would have led a reasonable person to believe that he or she was in custody is reviewed de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.