Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WI 105 - State v. Jerrell C.J.

State v. Jerrell C.J.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
7
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Lockhart (2010), Clark v. State (2008)

2 federal appellate · 71 state decisions

420200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 106 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Holmes · 70 Wis. 2d 508 - In Re Hon. Charles E. Kading · State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. Johnson · In re Cannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “be electronically recorded where feasible, and without exception when questioning occurs at a place of detention.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The superintending power is as broad and as flexible as necessary to insure the due administration of justice in the courts of this state.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “The purpose of this ['superintending control over inferior courts'] jurisdiction is to protect the legal rights of a litigant where the ordinary processes of action, appeal and review are inadequate to meet the situation, and where there is need for such intervention to avoid grave hardship or complete denial of rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.