State v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Love (2005), State v. Avery (2013)
2 federal appellate · 52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Vollmer v. Luety · 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss · 144 Wis. 2d 388 - State v. Schumacher · 208 Wis. 2d 463 - State v. McCallum · 110 Wis. 2d 555 - State v. Armstrong
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is it appropriate for a reviewing court to exercise its discretion to grant a new trial in the interest of justice.7 5 Wisconsin Stat. § 971.15(3) (stating that the burden on defendant in NGI trial is to prove”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the evidence was discovered after conviction; (2) the defendant was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“if it appears from the record that the real controversy has not been fully tried,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Henley · State v. Avery
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.