State v. ROBERT K.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 57 Wis. 2d 331 - Liberty Trucking Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations · 162 Wis. 2d 797 - Koestler v. Pollard · State v. Morford · 227 Wis. 2d 285 - State v. Scheidell · 143 Wis. 2d 856 - In INTEREST OF FEW v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e do not address the issue upon which the circuit court ruled, that is, whether a guardian ad litem's acquiescence in the circuit court's setting the fact-finding hearing beyond the 45-day period fulfills the consent requirement of Wis. Stat. § 48.315 (1)(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ny period of delay resulting from a continuance granted at the request of or with the consent of the child and his or her counsel or of the unborn child by the unborn child's guardian ad litem,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although a determination of good cause may be based on many factors, courts have emphasized the following four factors when evaluating good cause ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.