Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WI 19 - Hess v. Fernandez

Hess v. Fernandez’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2022

18 state decisions

120200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foman v. Davis · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Zahra v. Town of Southold · 90 Wis. 2d 823 - Stanhope v. Brown County · Martindale v. Ripp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given at any stage of the action when justice so requires.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A court misused its discretion if the court failed to exercise its discretion, the facts do not support the court's decision, or the court applied the wrong legal standard.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If evidence is objected to at the trial on the ground that it is not within the issues made by the pleadings, the court may allow the pleadings to be amended and shall do so freely when the presentation of the merits of the action will be subserved thereby and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the admission of such evidence would prejudice such party in maintaining the action or defense upon the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet such evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.