2005 WI 46 - State v. Tucker

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.

¶1{dissenting).

¶2¶ 26. I dissent in the instant case for the reasons set forth in my dissent in State v. Trujillo, 2005 WI 45, 279 Wis. 2d 712, 694 N.W.2d 933.

¶ 27. I am authorized to state that Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY joins this dissent.LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶3(dissenting).

¶4¶ 28. For the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Trujillo, 2005 WI 45, 279 Wis. 2d 712, 694 N.W.2d 933, I would overrule Hegwood and its progeny,1 and reverse and *711remand this action to the trial court for a determination of whether the change in penalty structure by the creation of TIS-II constitutes a new factor in this proceeding.

¶5¶ 29. I therefore respectfully dissent.

¶6See e.g., State v. Longmire, 2004 WI App 90, 272 Wis. 2d 759, 681 N.W.2d 534 and State v. Torres, 2003 WI App 199, 267 Wis. 2d 213, 670 N.W.2d 400.