Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WI 51 - Everson v. Lorenz

Everson v. Lorenz’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
2
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably ESTATE OF SUSTACHE v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company (2008), Liebovich v. Minnesota Insurance (2008)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 55 state decisions

360200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 119 Wis. 2d 722 - Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co. · SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance · Sheets v. Brethren Mutual Insurance · 33 Wis. 2d 552 - Grieb v. Citizens Casualty Co. · Danbeck v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where there is a volitional act involved in such a misrepresentation, that act removes it from coverage as an 'occurrence' under the liability insurance policy.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[a]n unintended and unforeseen injurious occurrence; something that does not occur in the usual course of events or that could not be reasonably anticipated.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[a]n unexpected, undesirable event' or 'an unforeseen incident' which is characterized by a 'lack of intention.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.