State v. Stenklyft’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Grady (2007), Grennier v. Frank (2006)
3 federal appellate · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Mathews v. Eldridge · Greenholtz v. Inmates of Nebraska Penal and Correctional Complex · Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The first phase, TIS–I, was enacted in June 1998 and applied to offenses committed on or after December 31, 1999. See 1997 Wis. Act 283. The second phase, TIS–II, was enacted in July 2002 and became effective February 1, 2003. See 2001 Wis. Act 109.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“To this end, absent ambiguity in a statute, we do not resort to extrinsic aids of interpretation and instead apply the plain meaning of the words of a statute in light of its textually manifest scope, context, and purpose.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.