State v. Manuel’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably State v. Saucier (2007), State v. Jensen (2007)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Dutton v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[E]x parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalent — that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations, prior testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used prosecutorially.' [Crawford, 541 U.S.] at 51.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. VanDyke · State v. Jensen“'[Statements that were made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would he available for use at a later trial.' [Crawford, 541 U.S.] at 52.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] solemn declaration or affirmation made for the purpose of establishing or proving some fact.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jensen · State v. Savanh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.