Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WIAPP 114 - State v. Miller

State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2022

14 state decisions

60200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Read · State v. Howard · 169 Wis. 2d 341 - State v. Windom · 208 Wis. 2d 492 - State v. Beiersdorf · 22 Wash. App. 640 - State v. Giebler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the dual goals of supervision: rehabilitation of the defendant and the protection of a state or community interest”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]ase law relating to the propriety of conditions of probation is applicable to conditions of supervision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a condition of extended supervision need not directly relate to the offense for which the defendant is convicted as long as the condition is reasonably related to the dual purposes of extended supervision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.