State v. JEREMY P.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2022
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Reno v. Flores · Smith v. Doe · State v. Pettit
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In light of our supreme court's conclusions in both Bollig and Hezzie, we cannot conclude that Jeremy has proven that Wis. Stat. §§ 938.34 (15m)(bm) and 301.45(1m) are unconstitutional under the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and article I, sections 7 and 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. C. G. · State v. C. G.“[t]he requirements of [Wis. Stat.] § 301.45 . . . are only imposed on a juvenile who is adjudicated delinquent where the particular facts of the case and concerns for public safety dictate it. This is not criminal punishment[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. C. G. · State v. C. G.“is potentially subject to . . . a possible need to register as a sex offender[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. C. G. · State v. C. G.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.