Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WI App 201 - State v. Johnson

2005 WI App 201 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2021

14 state decisions

80200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on GLENN v. Point Park College · 206 Wis. 2d 158 - Management Computer Services, Inc. v. Hawkins, Ash, Baptie & Co. · 84 Wis. 2d 455 - Merco Distributing Corp. v. Commercial Police Alarm Co. · Leonard Duckworth, Inc., and Kofender, Snoddy & Associates v. Michael L. Field and Company, and Michael L. Field, Individually · 230 Wis. 2d 324 - State v. Madlock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(5) In any case, the restitution order may require that the defendant do one or more of the following: (a) Pay all special damages, but not general damages, substantiated by evidence in the record, which could be recovered in a civil action against the defendant for his or her conduct in the commission of a crime considered at sentencing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “construe the restitution statute broadly and liberally to allow victims to recover their losses resulting from the criminal conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Any readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime is appropriate as special damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.