Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WIAPP 202 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co. · 108 Wis. 2d 282 - State v. Morris · State Ex Rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals · Commonwealth v. Gorham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the probationer is convicted of 2 or more crimes, including at least one felony, at the same time, the maximum original term of probation may be increased by one year for each felony conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he legislative history thus indicates a clear intent to increase the length of the probationary period for convictions at the same time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] statute should be construed to give effect to its leading idea and should be brought into harmony with its purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.