Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WIAPP 245 - State v. Savanh

State v. Savanh’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Bourjaily v. United States · Lilly v. Virginia · 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where testimonial statements are at issue, the only indicium of reliability sufficient to satisfy constitutional demands is the one the Constitution actually prescribes: confrontation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutional error. Id. at 63 . ¶ 44. Accordingly, Crawford reoriented the focus of Confrontation Clause claims from reliability back to confrontation. State v. Savanh, 2005 WI App 245, ¶ 19 , 287 Wis. 2d 876 , 707 N.W.2d 549 . The focus now is on the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Underlying this concern ... is the actual or perceived pressure on the declarant as a result of the government involvement in producing testimony with an eye toward trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.