Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WIAPP 249 - State v. Ziedonis

State v. Ziedonis’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Kramer (2009), State v. Pinkard (2010)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

120200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cady v. Dombrowski · 156 Wis. 2d 128 - State v. Richardson · 115 Wis. 2d 443 - State v. Boggess · 21 Cal. 4th 464 - People v. Ray · 155 Wis. 2d 77 - State v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the officers did not know the physical condition of the person and reasonably concluded that the situation was an emergency.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen a community caretaker function is asserted as justification for the seizure of a person, the trial court must determine: (1) that a seizure within the meaning of the fourth amendment has occurred; (2) if so, whether the police conduct was bona fide community caretaker activity; and (3) if so, whether the public need and interest outweigh the intrusion upon the privacy of the individual. 8”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[a]n officer less willing to discharge community caretaking functions implicates seriously undesirable consequences for society at large.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.