State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Mendenhall · United States v. West · State v. Williams · State v. Griffith · 207 Wis. 2d 600 - State v. Gaulrapp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a search authorized by consent is wholly valid unless that consent is given while an individual is illegally seized.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“We therefore read [(Lawrence)] Williams to require some verbal or physical demonstration by the officer, or some other equivalent facts, which clearly convey to the person that the traffic matter is concluded and that the person should be on his or her way. Absent that, it is a legal fiction to conclude that a reasonable person would deduce, infer or believe that he or she is free to depart the scene.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We conclude that, in view of all of the circumstances surrounding [co-defendant] O'Neal's consent, a reasonable person would not have felt free to ignore [Officer] Multer's questions and request to search the vehicle. Because O'Neal was seized for purposes of the Fourth Amendment at the time he gave consent for the search of his vehicle, his consent was invalid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.