Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 WIAPP 4 - State v. Matke

State v. Matke’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · 214 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Alexander · 105 Wis. 2d 32 - State v. Banks · 107 Wis. 2d 532 - State v. McAllister · 178 Wis. 2d 42 - State v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the proper factors, explained its rationale for the overall sentence it imposes, and the sentence is not unreasonable, the court does not erroneously exercise its discretion simply by failing to separately explain its rationale for each and every facet of the sentence imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a certain number within a specified period. Id. at 50-51 . The supreme court concluded that the statutory language evinced the legislature's intent that enhanced penalties apply when the requisite number of convictions have accumulated within the period specified,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he proper time to determine the number of a defendant's prior convictions for sentence enhancement purposes is at sentencing, regardless of whether some convictions may have occurred after a defendant committed the present offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.